Wrong - wronger - net zero emissionThis entire article shows the extreme illogic and contempt for humanity that the goal of net-zero emissions leads to: A highly dangerous and destructive ideology.I got some shocking insights into the illogic of a net-zero emissions fan yesterday. Here to the article.
Quote: First premise: The amount of CO₂ does not have to be reduced to zero globally, but to net zero. This means that no more is emitted than can be absorbed by nature. In figures, emissions must therefore be reduced from 40 Gt (coal equivalence) to 20 Gt. Criticism: The Amazon can go from being a CO2 absorber to a CO2 emitter, the IPCC report can contain so many uncertainties regarding thawing permafrost, but the overriding principle of faith must be: "Net zero emissions and everything will be fine again".
Quote: PV systems are installed as "fuel savers" for this purpose. Whenever the sun shines, and in many countries it does so almost all year round during the day, solar power replaces coal, oil or gas as a fuel for generating electricity. Criticism: The thought process behind the two major acts of sabotage in the German energy transition is presented here. As a fuel avoider, the 70 GW expansion target has been adopted. Whenever the sun shines, thermal power plants are switched off. However, there is a limit to this: you cannot switch off more thermal power plants than are currently switched on. This is why 70 GW was set as the expansion target for photovoltaics in Germany. Then came the second act of sabotage in September 2014: "We don't need electricity storage for another 20 years".
Quote: Production capacities will only be expanded slowly due to market saturation and then even slowly reduced again from 2035 onwards Criticism: Unbelievable: after a peak of 1365 GW annual production in 2035, the photovoltaic industry will be dismantled again. It is assumed that oil and gas will be available forever to blow 20 Gt of CO2 into the air every year. And if the oil industry is unable to produce 50 million barrels per day, then the largely dismantled photovoltaic industry will have to be rebuilt.
Quote: in 2050, it will only be 20 Gt. This amount of CO₂ can be completely absorbed by nature, so that the concentration of CO₂ in the atmosphere remains constant at around 500 ppm. This corresponds to a temperature increase of around 2.5°C (K), which seems bearable to me. Criticism: and forever amen.
Quote: The calculations do not include economic growth. Criticism: The eco-fascist cult of self-destruction is spreading worldwide in a flash, reducing economic growth in China and India and all the other emerging countries to zero. All the poor countries have to stay poor. Even just 2.7% global economic growth would be a doubling by 2050.
This entire article shows the extreme illogic and contempt for humanity that the net-zero emissions target leads to: The photovoltaic industry will be dismantled after 2035. Electricity storage is unnecessary, fossil fuel power plants will run at night. No economic growth, the majority of humanity must be kept in poverty. This highly dangerous and destructive ideology characterizes German politics.
PEGE - Planetary Engineering Group Earth is the counter-movement of reason in politics, philosophy and economic implementation for all this madness.
Announced in the city newspaper of Weiz on page 47: My lecture on September 18 from 19:00 at the Kunsthaus Weiz. EUROSOLAR AUSTRIA Solar Stammtisch on 19.09.2024 from 18:30: 20-minute lecture on "Solar-efficient settlement development in new buildings" and discussion. Location: A-1130 Vienna, Maxingstraße 76, Hotel-Restaurant Bergwirt Schönbrunn
Net zero emissions means reducing greenhouse gas emissions to a level that nature can supposedly absorb for a long time. For the rich, this means Maintain poverty, cause poverty, so that enough emission rights remain for the rich.
Planetary cleanup back to 350 ppm CO2 means around 47,000 TWh of electricity to filter 1 ppm CO2 from the atmosphere and recycle it into carbon and oxygen. Who can afford that? Only a rich humanity, 10 billion people in prosperity can do it.
It is a decision between 3 directions:
It's not about whether the shares will be worth 10 times or 100 times more in 20 years' time or whether they will only be worth a few cents. It's about the future of us all. Will there be a big showdown between eco-fascism and yesterday's fossils, or will it be possible to overcome the deep divisions in society and inspire supporters of both sides to work towards a great new goal? Global prosperity and planetary restoration instead of saving, restricting, renouncing and climate catastrophe or peak oil and a little more climate catastrophe. Both sides must be convinced that there is no solution that is even remotely viable. On the one hand, it must be shown that net-zero emissions are a completely inadequate target and that the goal must instead be a planetary clean-up back to 350 ppm CO2. The other side must be shown that solar power enables a higher standard of living than fossil energy. It's about survival! The social situation in 2024 compared to 2004. Extrapolating that to 2044 makes for a horror world! If we are successful and your shares are worth 100 times more, this is just an addition to all the other achievements. One new shareholder said "I with my very modest investment", but €4,000 times €1,000 is also €4 million for all investments up to the opening of the settlement in Unken as a starting point for global expansion. There is a reward program for recommending the share to others. Two of the new shareholders have become shareholders through this reward program. Here are the details.
My studies on off-grid fast-charging settlements have already resulted in initial contact and a video conference with the CEO of a major African company. The most important statements: "There are about 2 million homes missing" and "Solar-powered cement factories are a fascinating new idea". There are several chances of an event that could lead to a jump in the share price. At today's share price, € 2 million would be 10,000 packages at € 200 and 300,000 shares for the buyer. However, if these € 2 million are only worth 20% of the AG, this would logically result in a very significant jump in the share price. |
