The end of net zero emissions and everything will be fine againThe Guardian reports that almost no CO2 was absorbed on land in 2023. This makes the net-zero emissions target very dangerous climate change trivialization.
Limitism, never heard of it? In 2015, I founded the "Association for the Promotion of Infinitism". The aim was to compare Infinitism with the prevailing philosophies of the present day. On the one hand, there was neoliberalism. A name had yet to be found for the philosophy of constant "save, restrict, renounce" sermons and the prevention of anything that could grow: Limitism.
There were once "climate scientists" who kept writing "net zero emissions and everything will be fine again". What does that actually mean? Mankind emits 40 Gt of CO2, nature absorbs 20 Gt. So all you have to do is reduce emissions from 40 Gt to 20 Gt and everything will be fine again. But how is the amount of CO2 in the atmosphere supposed to fall? Not at all, that's not even envisaged with net zero emissions. But what if nature no longer absorbs 20 Gt of CO2 per year? Surely you don't doubt this thoroughly scientific thesis? In 2022, I picked apart the IPCC report, briefly summarized: We have no idea, but we still unalterably believe in "net zero emissions and everything will be fine". But even I wouldn't have thought how quickly everything would happen: The Guardian reports that almost no CO2 was absorbed on land in 2023. Further adherence to the net-zero emissions target is pure climate change denialism. If the COP 29 UN Climate Change Conference does not clearly move away from the goal of net zero emissions and demand viable targets, it must be labeled a climate change denier conference.
Over the decades, assessment criteria have been developed to make saving, cutting back and doing without always appear to be the only valid and best solution. Let's take the switch from petrol to electric scooters in China as an example. Electric mobility was first mentioned in a Chinese five-year plan in 1991. The idea behind it was that in order for a person to travel 100 km on a motorized two-wheeler, either 4 liters of crude oil must be imported or 1 kg of domestic coal must be converted into electricity. The petrol moped always remains a petrol moped, whereas the electric moped runs on any type of electricity, whether coal, nuclear, hydroelectric, wind or solar. That is pragmatism, tackling a problem step by step, that is Confucianism. In the West in 1991, on the other hand, there was a very short-term profit motive on the one hand and a fundamentalist attitude towards environmental protection characterized by limitism on the other. In this philosophy, the Elektromoped Simson SR 50 Gamma E developed in Germany in 1994 had no chance, even though it had a technical lead of around 10 years over China at the time. Bad? No, it could be much worse. The widespread belief in falling electricity demand in Germany until 2016: 70 GW expansion target for photovoltaics in Germany. The study published by AGORA Energiewende in 2014, We don't need electricity storage for the energy transition for another 20 years, are all blatant misjudgements caused by limitist assessment criteria.
The GEMINI house, regardless of whether it is the first GEMINI habitable solar power plant project or the GEMINI next generation house, does not fit into the world view of limitism. To put it bluntly: If you wanted to sell disinfectants for doctors in 1850, you had to support the theories of Ignaz Semmelweis and go strictly against the prevailing doctrine of the time that hygiene was a waste of time. From dissecting corpses straight to obstetrics, hygiene is a waste of time. 160 years later, "Batteries are a waste, the energy transition will work for another 20 years without batteries", "Planetary renovation is a completely unimaginable waste, net zero emissions are enough". The unhygienic doctors of that time only killed a few women, whereas the delusions of limitism are about the survival of humanity.
What is the cheapest way to buy electricity? What is the most expensive way to sell electricity? A few hours and an electricity trader with spot market prices can lie between the two answers. Here is an explanation of what balancing energy means Spotty Energie answered my question about balancing energy with "Yes, we will offer our customers participation in the balancing energy markets in the medium term". Participation in the balancing energy market will be an important opportunity for the GEMINI next generation houses to earn more money with the houses' energy system. I have been a Spotty Energie customer since December 2023 and am very satisfied, switch to Spotty Energie here
Net zero emissions means reducing greenhouse gas emissions to a level that nature can supposedly absorb for a long time. For the rich, this means Maintain poverty, cause poverty, so that enough emission rights remain for the rich. See the architect and her opinion that Africans don't need roads.
Planetary cleanup back to 350 ppm CO2 means about 47,000 TWh of electricity to filter 1 ppm CO2 from the atmosphere and recycle it into carbon and oxygen. Who can afford that? Only a rich human race, 10 billion people in prosperity can do it.
It is a decision between 3 directions:
It's not about whether the shares will be worth 10 times or 100 times more in 20 years' time or whether they will only be worth a few cents. It's about the future of us all. Will there be a big showdown between eco-fascism and yesterday's fossils, or will it be possible to overcome the deep divisions in society and inspire supporters of both sides to work towards a great new goal? Global prosperity and planetary restoration instead of saving, restricting, renouncing and climate catastrophe or peak oil and a little more climate catastrophe. Both sides must be convinced that they have no solution that is even remotely viable. On the one hand, it must be shown that net-zero emissions are a completely inadequate target and that the goal must instead be a planetary clean-up back to 350 ppm CO2. The other side must be shown that solar power enables a higher standard of living than fossil energy. It's about survival! The social situation in 2024 compared to 2004. Extrapolating that to 2044 makes for a horror world! If we are successful and your shares are worth 100 times more, this is just an addition to all the other achievements. One new shareholder said "I with my very modest investment", but €4,000 times €1,000 is also €4 million for all investments up to the opening of the settlement in Unken as a starting point for global expansion. There is a reward program for recommending the share to others. Two of the new shareholders have become shareholders through this reward program. Here are the details.
My studies on off-grid fast-charging settlements have already resulted in initial contact and a video conference with the CEO of a major African company. The most important statements: "There are about 2 million homes missing" and "Solar-powered cement factories are a fascinating new idea". For further negotiations, an NDA is being worked on. There are several chances of an event that could lead to a jump in the share price. At today's share price, € 2 million would be 10,000 packages at € 200 and 300,000 shares for the buyer. However, if these € 2 million are only worth 20% of the AG, this would logically result in a very significant jump in the share price. |
