Three eerie encounters in one weekWhere is there a vision of the future today that is worth fighting for? No Future is not a mental disorder in a few young people, but a reflection of our society.
My first contact was in 2010 when I came back from my lecture on restructuring the tax system in China. I called him before COP 29, but didn't get through to him for weeks. "We can't report on their vision of the future, we're just a daily newspaper." Of course, when the economic mood is very poor, a daily newspaper must not spread any positive visions.
On Tuesday, I spoke to an association that is something like the green figurehead of a state-owned electricity supplier. Of course, he doesn't like energy-optimized residential areas and somehow finds urban canyons much more homely. I must have spoken to him about electric scooters 15 years ago. He said that even then he didn't understand why I was in favor of electric scooters because there were bicycles and how much he rode his cargo bike. Quite simply:
He: I don't want to deal with that.
Newsletter from a green association in Germany. It said "For climate protection to succeed, we need a large majority to support it". Provoked by this, I called immediately. Me: The population can no longer stand all this preaching about saving, cutting back and doing without. He: we never demand saving, cutting back, doing without, everyone should be better off. Next, he tells me how he transports his 2 children and even a 100 kg washing machine on his cargo bike.
Since 1991, I have been concerned with a positive outlook for the future in every detail. But society has been exposed to this negative propaganda for decades. You'll be freezing at home, you'll be glad to have a cargo bike at all. Everything will get worse. I wrote about the consequential costs of all this negative dirt back in 1992 on page 229 of my book "Aufstieg zum Solarzeitalter". Compared to 1992, everything has become much more negative. It's time for a turnaround. The new brochure Infinitism, WWW and GEMINI next generation house shows philosophy, politics and economic implementation. To prove it, I am missing an absolutely ridiculous 4 M€. When I look at the financing of start-ups that want to solve tiny little problems, €4 million is absolutely ridiculous. A German startup for air cabs is just 300 to 400 M€ short. The world could survive without air cabs and there are several other start-ups that are tackling this issue. But there is only one start-up that wants to produce ClimateProtectionSuperiorityHouses.
Net zero emissions means reducing greenhouse gas emissions to a level that nature can supposedly absorb for a long time. For the rich, this means Maintain poverty, cause poverty, so that enough emission rights remain for the rich. See the architect and her opinion that Africans don't need roads.
Planetary cleanup back to 350 ppm CO2 means around 47,000 TWh of electricity to filter 1 ppm CO2 from the atmosphere and recycle it into carbon and oxygen. Who can afford that? Only a rich human race, 10 billion people in prosperity can do it. One million km² of energy-optimized settlement areas alone should contribute 150,000 TWh for the necessary electricity for world-wide prosperity and planetary restoration.
It's not about whether the shares will be worth 10 times or 100 times more in 20 years' time or whether they will only be worth a few cents. It's about the future of us all. Will there be a big showdown between eco-fascism and yesterday's fossils, or will it be possible to overcome the deep divisions in society and inspire supporters of both sides to work towards a great new goal? Global prosperity and planetary restoration instead of saving, restricting, renouncing and climate catastrophe or peak oil and a little more climate catastrophe. Both sides must be convinced that they have no solution that is even remotely viable. On the one hand, it must be shown that net-zero emissions are a completely inadequate target and that the goal must instead be a planetary clean-up back to 350 ppm CO2. The other side must be shown that solar power enables a higher standard of living than fossil energy. It's about survival! The social situation in 2024 compared to 2004. Extrapolating that to 2044 makes for a horror world! If we are successful and your shares are worth 100 times more, this is just an addition to all the other achievements. One new shareholder said, "Me with my very modest investment", but €4,000 times €1,000 is also €4 million for all investments up to the opening of the settlement in Unken as a starting point for global expansion. There is a reward program for recommending the share to others. Two of the new shareholders have become shareholders through this reward program. Here are the details.
My studies on off-grid fast-charging settlements have already resulted in initial contact and a video conference with the CEO of a major African company. The most important statements: "There are about 2 million homes missing" and "Solar-powered cement factories are a fascinating new idea". Last time we wrote about contacts to Africa. In the meantime, we have exchanged an NDA (non-disclosure agreement) and exchanged initial materials. We will keep you informed of any progress in the fascinating Ghanaian market. There are several chances of an event that could lead to a jump in the share price. At today's share price, € 2 million would be 10,000 packages at € 200 and 300,000 shares for the buyer. However, if these € 2 million are only worth 20% of the AG, this would logically result in a very significant jump in the share price. |
