Energy systems of the futureThe first way to examine such a document is to search for specific keywords: kW, MW, GW, battery, storage. Wow, no concrete numbers, so style politician talk.Headline in Der Spiegel: Study by science academies Power supply secure even without base load power plants. This is the conclusion of a study by the "Energy Systems of the Future" (ESYS) project. Of course I have to take a look at that. There are 2 PDFs on this website. The first way to examine such a document is to search for specific keywords: kW, MW, GW, battery, storage. Wow, that's in the typical style of a modern-day politician's speech: no concrete figures, you can get nailed with concrete figures, so they must be avoided at all costs. But those who write peak-load power plants obviously want to continue the nonsense with almost no batteries. If you have massive amounts of batteries, you no longer need peak-load power plants. Let's compare this with my study "Germany 100% Solar" from 2021, which showed 2890 full-load hours for the 80 GW CCGT power plants. This simulation showed that each of these power plants is switched on twice and switched off twice in the winter half-year, i.e. on average each runs for 1445 hours with ideal efficiency. Yes, there are concrete figures, someone can come along and say "In my simulation, there are only 2100 full load hours and lower total costs, 2890 is untenable nonsense". Maybe that's even me, because the 2021 simulation was based on the assumption that 100% of the harvested solar power would be utilized. However, the simulations from May 2024 showed that the cost optimum is not to be found there.
I called one of the top members of the "last generation" in Austria. How they mobilized people to pay the fines. The amount of money would have fully financed the factory building and the model estate.
Unfortunately, I can't help you. Please do not call again.
The negotiations began in 1999. Back then, the idea was to trade cars for meat. Cars produced in the EU to South America in exchange for cheap meat and other agricultural products to Europe. At that time, nobody, including me, had any idea what would happen to the EU car industry 25 years later. I only realized the fate of the EU car industry in March 2008 when I saw the BYD F3DM Plug-in Hybrid at the Geneva Motor Show. Here is a video about a BYD Dolphin in Brazil. So what does the EU want to export more to South America with the Mercosur agreement? Or is it not about exporting at all, but only about destroying its own agriculture?
Net zero emissions means reducing greenhouse gas emissions to a level that nature can supposedly absorb for a long time. For the rich, this means Maintain poverty, cause poverty, so that enough emission rights remain for the rich. See the architect and her opinion that Africans don't need roads.
Planetary cleanup back to 350 ppm CO2 means around 47,000 TWh of electricity to filter 1 ppm CO2 from the atmosphere and recycle it into carbon and oxygen. Who can afford that? Only a rich human race, 10 billion people in prosperity can do it. One million km² of energy-optimized settlement areas alone should contribute 150,000 TWh for the necessary electricity for world-wide prosperity and planetary restoration.
It's not about whether the shares will be worth 10 times or 100 times more in 20 years' time or whether they will only be worth a few cents. It's about the future of us all. Will there be a big showdown between eco-fascism and yesterday's fossils, or will it be possible to overcome the deep divisions in society and inspire supporters of both sides to work towards a great new goal? Global prosperity and planetary restoration instead of saving, restricting, renouncing and climate catastrophe or peak oil and a little more climate catastrophe. Both sides must be convinced that they have no solution that is even remotely viable. On the one hand, it must be shown that net-zero emissions are a completely inadequate target and that the goal must instead be a planetary clean-up back to 350 ppm CO2. The other side must be shown that solar power enables a higher standard of living than fossil energy. It's about survival! The social situation in 2024 compared to 2004. Extrapolating that to 2044 makes for a horror world! If we are successful and your shares are worth 100 times more, this is just an addition to all the other achievements. One new shareholder said "I with my very modest investment", but €4,000 times €1,000 is also €4 million for all investments up to the opening of the settlement in Unken as a starting point for global expansion. There is a reward program for recommending the share to others. Two of the new shareholders have become shareholders through this reward program. Here are the details.
My studies on off-grid fast-charging settlements have already resulted in initial contact and a video conference with the CEO of a major African company. The most important statements: "There are about 2 million homes missing" and "Solar-powered cement factories are a fascinating new idea". Initial negotiations have been held with two financing platforms. There are several chances of an event that could lead to a jump in the share price. At today's share price, € 2 million would be 10,000 packages at € 200 and 300,000 shares for the buyer. However, if these € 2 million are only worth 20% of the AG, this would logically result in a very significant jump in the share price. |