No electricity sales possible today from 03:00 to 18:00I can already see “happy hour” campaigns at the first model estate, where fast charging will be offered at 10 cents/kWh in times of negative spot market prices.
The spot market prices are only negative from 05:00 to 18:00, but there is an additional 1.5 cent charge from the electricity trader. If the electricity price is below 1.5 cents, you also pay extra. No electricity sales possible for 15 hours from 03:00 to 18:00. How can electricity be offered so cheaply? The price difference between the EEG feed-in tariff and the spot market price is paid by the German taxpayer. Only the worst and meanest enemies of the energy transition could have come up with such madness.
This madness requires adjustments so that the energy system of a house can still pay for itself.
I can already see “happy hour” campaigns at the first model estate, where fast charging will be offered at 10 cents/kWh in times of negative spot market prices. The model settlement in Unken will have 200 kW of photovoltaics and 600 kWh of batteries. On a very sunny summer day, this is a yield of 1200 kWh. If only 600 kWh can be stored for feeding into the grid at reasonable prices, then 20 electric cars, each charging 30 kWh, should take the rest.
The Intersolar trade fair is taking place in Munich from June 19 to 21. I will be there for 3 days to find out about feeding electricity directly from the battery into the medium-voltage grid. The connection fees per kW are cheaper, so you can have almost twice as much kW at the same cost. This is an opportunity for personal meetings with me.
There is a group that wants an energy transition, but has so far managed the 2 biggest acts of sabotage against the energy transition:
We will systematically increase the CO2 tax over the next 20 years, but return all this tax revenue to the taxpayer. Revenue neutral! We expect the economy to make you, as taxpayers, ever better offers for CO2 tax evasion. Our goal is not high revenues from the CO2 tax, but no revenues from the CO2 tax. with: We have draconian penalties for anyone who does not convert to a heat pump. The heat pump supplier will offer you a heat pump at outrageously exorbitant prices because our draconian penalties are even worse. Unfortunately, the other political groups have a sinister tendency to want to make things worse rather than better. They do not propagate a better energy transition, but no energy transition.
I already brought you the documentary on the decline of the German car industry in 2017. Could anyone have guessed that things could get much worse? Surprising removal of the subsidy premium and populist politicians fighting against the ban on the registration of ICE cars in the EU from 2035. Germany is the only country with a decline in electric car registrations. 2035 is 11 years away. Let's take a look back 11 years. Back then, I had my first ride in a Tesla S at Intersolar. The Renault dealer had a Renault Zoe for €42,000. Comparable cars with a petrol engine were available for around €8,000. I once drove such a first-generation Renault Zoe 145 km to Landshut. It was quoted with a range of 210 km, pure fantasy figures, because I arrived in Landshut with 44 km remaining range. Today, the Tesla Y RWD is on offer for €39,990. You also have to take inflation since 2013 into account. The €42,000 for the Renault Zoe in 2013 is now €59,339 adjusted for inflation, more expensive than a Tesla Y Performance. This very rapid development will continue until 2035. Renault Zoe 2013 against Tesla Y 2024 is like comparing a Ford T 1910 against a VW Passat GTI from 1980. Isn't this comparison exaggerated? No, with the Renault Zoe you would have had to allow 3 charging breaks for the 320 km from Sankt Leonhard to Vienna. With 32 A three-phase current, charging takes quite a long time. The Renault Zoe would therefore have taken longer to get to Vienna than a Ford T. Who is seriously going to buy a combustion engine in 2035?
This inflation calculator is very helpful in correctly estimating previous costs and income.
Net zero emissions means reducing greenhouse gas emissions to a level that nature can absorb. For the rich, this means Maintain poverty, cause poverty, so that enough emission rights remain for the rich.
Planetary cleanup back to 350 ppm CO2 means around 47,000 TWh of electricity to filter 1 ppm CO2 from the atmosphere and recycle it into carbon and oxygen. Who can afford that? Only a rich humanity, 10 billion people in prosperity can do it.
It is a decision between 3 directions:
It's not about whether the shares will be worth 10 times or 100 times more in 20 years' time or whether they will only be worth a few cents. It's about the future of us all. Will there be a big showdown between eco-fascism and yesterday's fossils, or will it be possible to overcome the deep divisions in society and inspire supporters of both sides to work towards a great new goal? Global prosperity and planetary restoration instead of saving, restricting, renouncing and climate catastrophe or peak oil and a little more climate catastrophe. Both sides must be convinced that there is no solution that is even remotely viable. On the one hand, it must be shown that net-zero emissions are a completely inadequate target and that the goal must instead be a planetary clean-up back to 350 ppm CO2. The other side must be shown that solar power enables a higher standard of living than fossil energy. It's about survival! The social situation in 2024 compared to 2004. Extrapolating that to 2044 makes for a horror world! If we are successful and your shares are worth 100 times more, this is just an addition to all the other achievements. One new shareholder said "I with my very modest investment", but €4,000 times €1,000 is also €4 million for all investments up to the opening of the settlement in Unken as a starting point for global expansion. There is a reward program for recommending the share to others. Two of the new shareholders have become shareholders through this reward program. Here are the details. |
